Championing AI Innovation and Transparency: Google and IBM's Call for Enhanced Government Support
- AlyData
- Jul 14, 2023
- 2 min read
In an epoch marked by rapid digital transformation, Artificial Intelligence (AI) continues to emerge as a crucial factor in many aspects of society and the economy. Recently, leading tech conglomerates, Google and IBM, approached the federal government, urging it to prioritize and foster AI innovation and transparency. This appeal underscores the need for a collaborative approach between governmental institutions and the private sector in navigating the complex world of AI.
Citing the potential setbacks of having a single AI "super regulator," Google and IBM have voiced against such an approach, arguing it could hamper the flow of innovation. The tech behemoths instead propose the utilization of current regulatory bodies and resources to bolster AI advancements.
Why does this matter?
As AI technologies become more pervasive, their ethical and safe use becomes an issue of public concern, necessitating the government's active involvement to ensure responsible use and development.
Google and IBM suggest adopting a more adaptable, risk-based regulatory framework, specifically tailored to individual AI applications. They emphasize that a rigid one-size-fits-all regulatory structure could prove detrimental to AI's potential growth and innovation.
Additionally, both companies propose increased budgetary allocation for AI research and development. Investment in this sector, they argue, will not only spur technological advancements but also provide a deeper understanding of AI and its implications.
Moreover, they call for enhanced transparency around AI usage. Greater clarity about how businesses utilize AI and the nature of data they gather will foster trust and ensure the technology aligns with societal values and norms.
While the Biden administration has yet to formally address these recommendations, it has previously acknowledged the transformative potential of AI, as well as the significant questions it raises about privacy, security, and fairness. This suggests a likelihood of government responsiveness to these industry calls for action.
In addition to these overarching themes, Google and IBM propose specific steps to nurture AI innovation and transparency, including:
Boosting AI Research and Development Funding: The government should augment AI research funding across both private and public sectors to stimulate basic AI research and the development of innovative AI technologies.
Establishing an AI Ethics and Safety Task Force: A dedicated task force on AI ethics and safety can consolidate insights from industry, academia, and government experts to formulate ethical guidelines for AI use and development.
Developing a National AI Strategy: A clear, national AI strategy will outline governmental objectives for AI development and use, providing a roadmap to achieve those goals.
Implementing a Risk-Based Approach to AI Regulation: Focusing regulation on AI applications posing significant societal risks is another key proposal.
Encouraging Transparency in AI Usage: Companies should be mandated to disclose their AI usage and data collection practices, promoting transparency and accountability.
Google and IBM's call for government support signifies a pivotal moment in the AI landscape. It not only validates the government's critical role in AI regulation but also provides a comprehensive blueprint to foster responsible AI development and usage. As such, these proposed strategies serve as a crucial starting point for governmental consideration and underline the increasing significance of AI in our society.




Comments